• About
  • Best Baby Names
  • Celebrity Baby Names
  • Celebrity Baby Names – Current
  • Celebrity Baby Names – Past
  • Featured Boys Names
  • Featured Girls Names
  • Featured Unisex Names
  • Links to Name Data
  • Waltzing on the Web

Waltzing More Than Matilda

~ Names with an Australian Bias of Democratic Temper

Waltzing More Than Matilda

Tag Archives: Kidspot

The Top 50 Names in Australia from Kidspot for 2015

26 Tuesday Apr 2016

Posted by A.O. in Name Data

≈ Comments Off on The Top 50 Names in Australia from Kidspot for 2015

Tags

Kidspot, popular names

GIRLS

  1. Charlotte
  2. Olivia
  3. Ava
  4. Amelia
  5. Mia
  6. Chloe
  7. Emily
  8. Sophie
  9. Grace
  10. Ella
  11. Ruby
  12. Isla
  13. Isabella
  14. Evie
  15. Zoe
  16. Matilda
  17. Harper
  18. Scarlett
  19. Ivy
  20. Sophia
  21. Sienna
  22. Lily
  23. Evelyn
  24. Emma
  25. Lucy
  26. Georgia
  27. Hannah
  28. Willow
  29. Zara
  30. Eva
  31. Isabelle
  32. Abigail
  33. Aria
  34. Layla
  35. Alice
  36. Mila
  37. Imogen
  38. Maddison
  39. Violet
  40. Annabelle
  41. Stella
  42. Elizabeth
  43. Savannah
  44. Ellie
  45. Audrey
  46. Summer
  47. Mackenzie
  48. Piper
  49. Sofia
  50. Sarah
BOYS

  1. Oliver
  2. William
  3. Jack
  4. Noah
  5. Thomas
  6. James
  7. Ethan
  8. Lucas
  9. Liam
  10. Lachlan
  11. Mason
  12. Henry
  13. Charlie
  14. Alexander
  15. Harrison
  16. Samuel
  17. Max
  18. Cooper
  19. Isaac
  20. Benjamin
  21. Jacob
  22. Levi
  23. Joshua
  24. Leo
  25. Hudson
  26. Hunter
  27. Oscar
  28. Harry
  29. Ryan
  30. Xavier
  31. Archie
  32. Elijah
  33. Riley
  34. Daniel
  35. George
  36. Sebastian
  37. Logan
  38. Archer
  39. Jackson
  40. Flynn
  41. Tyler
  42. Hugo
  43. Jayden
  44. Edward
  45. Aiden
  46. Michael
  47. Patrick
  48. Jaxon
  49. Nate
  50. Lincoln and Connor

GIRLS

Fastest Rising
Elizabeth (+9 at least), Evelyn and Stella (+9)

Fastest Falling
Jasmine (-15 at least), Alexis (-13 at least), Sienna (-7)

New
Elizabeth, Mackenzie, Piper, Sarah

Gone
Jasmine, Alexis, Madison, Poppy

BOYS

Fastest Risers
Hugo (+9 at least), George and Leo (+8)

Fastest Fallers
Jackson (-10), Jaxon (-9), Patrick (-7)

New
Hugo, Michael, Connor

Gone
Blake, Eli

Note: Kidspot compiles data from the state and territory birth registries, except the ACT and Tasmania, who did not provide data.

The Top 50 Baby Names in Australia for 2014 from Kidspot

03 Sunday May 2015

Posted by A.O. in Name Data

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Kidspot, popular names

GIRLS

  1. Olivia (1795)
  2. Charlotte (1672)
  3. Mia (1551)
  4. Ava (1487)
  5. Amelia (449)
  6. Emily (1394)
  7. Sophie (1348)
  8. Chloe (1340)
  9. Ruby (1282)
  10. Grace (1212)
  11. Ella (1185)
  12. Isabella (1177)
  13. Isla (1066)
  14. Sienna (943)
  15. Zoe (941)
  16. Sophia (908)
  17. Scarlett (873)
  18. Lily (870)
  19. Matilda (864)
  20. Ivy (863)
  21. Evie (836)
  22. Harper (794)
  23. Lucy (792)
  24. Emma (781)
  25. Hannah (755)
  26. Zara (703)
  27. Willow (681)
  28. Abigail (668)
  29. Georgia (664)
  30. Isabelle (619)
  31. Layla (619)
  32. Evelyn (611)
  33. Eva (603)
  34. Imogen (556)
  35. Annabelle (546)
  36. Jasmine (541)
  37. Maddison (524)
  38. Alexis (501)
  39. Aria (479)
  40. Savannah (479)
  41. Mila (455)
  42. Alice (449)
  43. Sofia (449)
  44. Audrey (447)
  45. Madison (440)
  46. Ellie (430)
  47. Violet (430)
  48. Poppy (428)
  49. Summer (428)
  50. Stella (425)
BOYS

  1. Oliver (2188)
  2. William (1958)
  3. Jack (1840)
  4. Noah (1667)
  5. Thomas (1446)
  6. Lucas (1401)
  7. James (1400)
  8. Ethan (1257)
  9. Alexander (1198)
  10. Liam (1188)
  11. Lachlan (1186)
  12. Harrison (1158)
  13. Mason (1139)
  14. Samuel (1104)
  15. Max (1083)
  16. Cooper (1054)
  17. Charlie (1045)
  18. Jacob (1041)
  19. Henry (1037)
  20. Hunter (992)
  21. Joshua (988)
  22. Isaac (963)
  23. Benjamin (939)
  24. Xavier (906)
  25. Oscar (884)
  26. Harry (874)
  27. Levi (867)
  28. Ryan (815)
  29. Jackson (798)
  30. Elijah (792)
  31. Hudson (786)
  32. Leo (783)
  33. Daniel (763)
  34. Archie (755)
  35. Riley (745)
  36. Logan (735)
  37. Sebastian (714)
  38. Jayden (704)
  39. Jaxon (666)
  40. Patrick (664)
  41. Archer (650)
  42. Tyler (642)
  43. George (640)
  44. Nate (625)
  45. Flynn (619)
  46. Blake (600)
  47. Aiden (562)
  48. Edward (550)
  49. Lincoln (549)
  50. Eli (520)

Royal Baby Meltdown, Name Discrimination, and Other Name Stories in the News

11 Thursday Sep 2014

Posted by A.O. in Names in the News

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

bogan names, classic baby names, creative names, Essential Baby, famous namesakes, Kidspot, locational names, name studies, royal baby names

ImageResizer

Royal Baby 2.0
Yes, it’s another baby expected by the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, due in April next year. The Internet goes wild, bookies make billions, name bloggers all collapse from guessing until our brains explode. So far, punters are gunning for a brown-haired girl, and the most popular names for the prince or princess, younger sibling to George, are James for a boy, and Elizabeth for a girl.

I am very sceptical of an Elizabeth, as the queen has apparently made it clear she is not interested in having a namesake (royal babies with Elizabeth as their middle name are supposedly named after the queen’s mother, not Elizabeth II). To me, George and James are too similar-sounding as brothers, and surely the heir to the throne needs a distinctive name, if only for publicity purposes? However, the Duke and Duchess may not agree with my name advice.

You can read plenty of baby name predictions online (most of them are just recycling their guesses for Prince George, with the name George removed). I won’t be doing anything in regard to the name until much closer to the royal birth, as I think it is far too early. They aren’t even at the twelve-week mark yet, and the duchess is ill with severe morning sickness. Give them some space, people!

Last time, my bizarre method of tracking royal baby names turned out to be unexpectedly successful (for a boy, anyway; it might have been totally wrong if George had been a girl), but next time we might try something completely different, and see how that goes.

Utter Drivel Bogan
Kidspot have brought out a rather cringe-making article on “bogan baby names”, which they pretend is all in good fun.

Clare asked on her Scoop page whether this was as controversial or potentially offensive as calling names “chavvy”? I would say, yes Clare, it is: it’s like an article about chavvy names, redneck names, ghetto names, and the like. Despite protestations to the contrary, articles like these are intended to be offensive, and they certainly seem mean-spirited.

Apart from being copied from other sources, the article has some real clangers, such as saying Zaiden is “made up”, when it’s an elaboration of the Arabic name Zaid. Or listing the name Princ’ess, which isn’t even allowed in Australia.

Jorja Fights Back!
One person who took exception to Kidspot’s article was Jorja Orreal, whose name happened to feature on the list of “bogan names”. She loves her name, and her mother says it is not bogan at all, but very pretty. Jorja was named thus because her mum noticed that best-selling author Sidney Sheldon dedicated several of his novels to his wife at the time, actress Jorja Curtright. As she points out, how could the man behind I Dream of Jeannie possibly be associated with something in poor taste?

Jorja believes her name actually looks like a name, rather than Georgia, which is also a country and an American state, and seems more feminine. Unfortunately, she then loses every bit of my sympathy she might have mustered by going on to trash the names that she thinks are really bogan. Thanks to her intervention, my comments on the Kidspot article were much less severe.

Reach the Top of Your Game with a Creative Name
Almost everyone agrees: “creative” names are a terrible idea. Received wisdom is that it’s better to be a Chloe than a Kloey, James looks more professional than Jaymezz, and a traditional name like Elizabeth or William will gain greater esteem than a modern concoction like Neveah or Latrell. Essential Baby examines this idea by seeing if it stands up in the modern workplace.

In fact, there’s a lot to be said for “creative” names, perhaps most of all that they tend to be memorable, and can also be a great ice-breaker. Interviews with a couple of creatively-named people in business demonstrate that their names have been an asset to their careers. It seemed to me that their attitude to their names was really important, because they expected people to have trouble spelling their names, and were relaxed about the idea that people might find them amusing. Could those people skills have been gained through constant negotiations with others over their names?

Paul Barbaro, a spokesman from a recruitment agency, believes the idea that a “classic” baby name has prestige is an old and outdated one, and that people today are much less judgemental, being used to a wide variety of names (someone alert Kidspot to this valuable information!). He suggests that unusual names are now the norm, and that it can be helpful to have a name that is a little different, or globally recognised.

However, language expert Roly Sussex, from the University of Queensland, appears to be unconvinced. He can’t think of many people in public life with an unusual name, and thinks it would be far better to have a name that everyone knows how to spell and pronounce. But perhaps his attitudes really are outdated.

Should You Change Your “Ethnic” Name?
Roly Sussex thought that people with ethnic names were more likely to be successful if they anglicised their names, or used a nickname.

While I’m not sure if it will help you become successful in the long-term, the sad news is that it will probably help you to get a foot in the door. Researchers from the Australian National University submitted 4000 fictitious CVs for entry level jobs, and found that people with a Middle Eastern name need to submit 64% more applications that one with an Anglo-Saxon name to gain a job interview, while those with Chinese names need to submit 68% more applications, Indigenous names 35% more, and Italian names 12% more.

The study also showed that name discrimination was not evenly applied, and there could be differences when other factors were changed. For example, men of all minority ethnic groupings found it harder to get interviews than women; waitstaff and data entry jobs were the most likely to discriminate against ethnic minority males.

The city the person is in makes a difference too, with Sydney the most biased city against people with ethnic names – a Chinese person in Brisbane must submit 57% more applications, while in Sydney, it is a whopping 92% more. There was no evidence of discrimination against Italians in Melbourne, which has a relatively high Italian population.

Middle Eastern job seekers fared better when they applied for jobs with a non-Anglo employer or in ethnically diverse neighbourhoods. Interestingly, while a Chinese employer was much more likely to give someone with a Chinese name a callback, Italian employers were significantly less likely to offer someone with an Italian name an interview!

The entry level job that appeared to have the least amount of discrimination was customer service: your name doesn’t seem to make much difference when it comes to getting an interview in this field.

And there is some good news to go along with this rather depressing research. A study conducted by the University of Melbourne this year found that ethnic minority jobseekers were much more discriminated against during the application process than they were once they had actually secured a position.

Some people who did use an English name or an English nickname to find work felt comfortable enough to revert back to their real name in the workplace, and some were even encouraged to do so by their fellow colleagues. So if you write Rick on your resume, it doesn’t mean you can’t become Rashid again once you have been successful in your interview.

The Top 50 Names in Australia

14 Monday Apr 2014

Posted by A.O. in Name Data

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Kidspot, name popularity, popular names

 

GIRLS

  1. Charlotte
  2. Olivia
  3. Ava
  4. Emily
  5. Mia
  6. Amelia
  7. Chloe
  8. Ruby
  9. Isabella
  10. Sophie
  11. Ella
  12. Grace
  13. Sienna
  14. Zoe
  15. Matilda
  16. Lily
  17. Isla
  18. Sophia
  19. Emma
  20. Lucy
  21. Ivy
  22. Evie
  23. Hannah
  24. Scarlett
  25. Zara
  26. Harper
  27. Layla
  28. Abigail
  29. Eva
  30. Georgia
  31. Willow
  32. Isabelle
  33. Imogen
  34. Jasmine
  35. Jessica
  36. Madison
  37. Alexis
  38. Evelyn
  39. Sofia
  40. Alice
  41. Sarah
  42. Mackenzie
  43. Stella
  44. Audrey
  45. Annabelle
  46. Savannah
  47. Chelsea
  48. Maddison
  49. Summer
  50. Elizabeth
BOYS

  1. Oliver
  2. William
  3. Jack
  4. Noah
  5. James
  6. Thomas
  7. Ethan
  8. Lucas
  9. Lachlan
  10. Joshua
  11. Liam
  12. Cooper
  13. Mason
  14. Alexander
  15. Jacob
  16. Samuel
  17. Harrison
  18. Max
  19. Isaac
  20. Charlie
  21. Benjamin
  22. Xavier
  23. Henry
  24. Oscar
  25. Daniel
  26. Harry
  27. Hunter
  28. Riley
  29. Levi
  30. Jayden
  31. Logan
  32. Ryan
  33. Jackson
  34. Hudson
  35. Sebastian
  36. Tyler
  37. Jaxon
  38. Elijah
  39. Leo
  40. Flynn
  41. Aiden
  42. Zachary
  43. Jake
  44. Archie
  45. Patrick
  46. Michael
  47. Blake
  48. Matthew
  49. Joseph
  50. Nicholas

NOTE: The Australian Top 50 is put together by Kidspot parenting website, and unlike the Top 100, it doesn’t combine spellings. Data from the Australian Capital Territory is not included. I did try to look at the names which fell and rose the most in popularity, but found it wasn’t really possible because of the differences between the Top 50 and Top 100, and different ways they had been collated.

 

Name News Round Up

17 Tuesday Dec 2013

Posted by A.O. in Names in the News

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Baby Center Australia, birth data, birth registries, celebrity names, choosing baby names, fictional namesakes, French names, Kidspot, middle names, name meaning, name trends, names from television, naming laws, popular names, rare names, Starts at Sixty

News

Baby Center Australia has released its most popular names for 2013, with Oliver and Charlotte taking the #1 positions. Names with a strong V featured prominently, including Ava, Evie and Ivy, and X, with Jaxon and Jaxson included along with Jackson. Less common names from the site: Blue, Chevy, Blip and Daxx.

Meanwhile, News Limited looked at data from birth registries all over Australia to see how popular culture is affecting name choices. Some names from Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, Dexter, Downton Abbey, Mad Men, NCIS, How I Met Your Mother, and The Big Bang Theory are up, or appearing for the first time. There’s some rubbery figures, with whole groups of names being counted together, and even quite common names like Abby and Catelyn being counted as “pop culture”. Numbers are statistically significant, but overall very low, so no need to panic in regard to popularity. Most interesting factoid: Dexter peaked in 2010 at 67 births, so the chances of this name hitting the Top 100 are slipping away. Also the fairly ridiculous assertion that “popular culture” names will put your child in hospital … Health Department, please release a health warning on names!

Sabrina Rogers-Anderson from Kidspot is French Canadian by origin, and wanted a French middle name for her daughter, so she and her husband chose Fée – French for “fairy”, and pronounced FAY. Unfortunately, when they went to register the baby’s name in New South Wales, they were told that all accents and diacritical marks were forbidden. Rather than name their baby Arabella Fee, they changed the spelling and went with Fae. However, Sabrina believes that the rule is culturally insensitive, as it disallows valid names and spellings from other countries.

Rebel Wylie from Kidspot is expecting baby number three, a boy, and finds that all is not going well in choosing the name. In her tongue-in-cheek article, she claims her husband Andy is not playing fair in the baby name discussions, because he rejects every name she comes up with, but never suggests anything himself. After moaning about it to her girlfriends, it turns out The Sisterhood believes that the mother gets automatic naming rights as the one bonus of an otherwise miserable pregnancy. Rebel enthusiastically becomes a supporter of this theory, and chooses the name herself. She says Andy only gets a say-so if he can come up with something (she likes) better. A lot of angry comments from people who didn’t find it funny, but some interesting ones too.

Starts at Sixty website looked at the top baby names of 1950, with Jennifer and Peter leading the pack. The author of the article opines that in the past, parents were much more interested in tradition and the meanings of names, and chose accordingly, while today parents choose names from favourite places, TV stars, and brand names. I’m not convinced that parents don’t care about name meaning today – I get so many search terms from people looking for a name with a particular meaning. Lots of interesting comments from the 60+ crowd on how their names were chosen – including a Julie who had her name picked out of a hat (meaning and tradition?!) There were also plenty named after film stars, showing that celebrity name inspiration is no new phenomenon.

The Logan Reporter mourns the days when Sally, Jane, David and Brian were popular names. Newsflash from Logan – the 1960s are over. They’re still coping with the time-lag, including some problems with multicultural Australia. Oh dear.

The Top 50 Girls and Boys Names in Australia for 2012

06 Saturday Apr 2013

Posted by A.O. in Name Data

≈ 6 Comments

Tags

Kidspot, name popularity, popular names, US name trends

This is a national Top 50 which was drawn up by Kidspot parenting website, using data from the birth registries of each state. It doesn’t include the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory.

Interestingly, the data shows that more girls than boys received a popular name in Australia, while I am told that in the United States boys are more likely to be given a popular name than their female counterparts.

GIRLS

  1. Charlotte 1839
  2. Ruby 1787
  3. Olivia 1655
  4. Chloe 1618
  5. Sophie 1593
  6. Emily 1583
  7. Mia 1546
  8. Amelia 1541
  9. Ava 1475
  10. Isabella 1427
  11. Ella 1396
  12. Grace 1304
  13. Sienna 1249
  14. Lily 1222
  15. Zoe 1053
  16. Sophia 1024
  17. Emma 880
  18. Isla 865
  19. Hannah 554
  20. Lucy 778
  21. Matilda 736
  22. Ivy 688
  23. Evie 669
  24. Eva 655
  25. Scarlett 614
  26. Abigail 610
  27. Maddison 570
  28. Madison 564
  29. Summer 551
  30. Lilly 545
  31. Chelsea 532
  32. Zara 499
  33. Jessica 494
  34. Isabelle 489
  35. Savannah 471
  36. Jasmine 469
  37. Georgia 459
  38. Layla 453
  39. Harper 432
  40. Sarah 422
  41. Alexis 395
  42. Stella 373
  43. Alice 364
  44. Willow 357
  45. Imogen 345
  46. Mackenzie 342
  47. Elizabeth 333
  48. Holly 332
  49. Annabelle 326
  50. Audrey 317

BOYS

  1. Jack 1388
  2. William 1264
  3. Noah 1159
  4. Ethan 1158
  5. Oliver 1126
  6. Thomas 1039
  7. Cooper 1019
  8. James 1004
  9. Lucas 968
  10. Lachlan 924
  11. Liam 901
  12. Samuel 836
  13. Jacob 826
  14. Joshua 809
  15. Mason 806
  16. Riley 777
  17. Max 770
  18. Alexander 769
  19. Charlie 742
  20. Xavier 738
  21. Benjamin 711
  22. Harrison 667
  23. Tyler 635
  24. Hunter 607
  25. Ryan 606
  26. Levi 597
  27. Isaac 551
  28. Jackson 543
  29. Blake 528
  30. Harry 471
  31. Braxton 449
  32. Oscar 446
  33. Henry 442
  34. Eli 436
  35. Daniel 395
  36. Jayden 366
  37. Jaxon 344
  38. Logan 344
  39. Jake 324
  40. Sebastian 319
  41. Flynn 316
  42. Patrick 301
  43. Hudson 288
  44. Dylan 264
  45. Mitchell 263
  46. Archie 259
  47. Connor 254
  48. Luke 254
  49. Matthew 248
  50. Aiden 243

Name Trends in Australia for 2012 – Girls

06 Saturday Apr 2013

Posted by A.O. in Name Data

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Kidspot, McCrindle Research, name trends, popular names

I looked up Kidspot’s 2011 name data in order to see which names rose and fell the most, and as the list only covers the Top 50, I also consulted the national Top 100 for 2011 compiled by McCrindle Research. Although there were some differences in their methodologies (most notably McCrindle combined spellings for certain names), I thought it would be interesting to get at least an estimate for names which had risen far in the past year.

It may seem a bit controversial, but when I checked it against known numbers from Kidspot, it gave the same answer most of the time, and when it differed, it usually did so by only 1 or 2 places. So some of these may only be estimates, but I think they are reasonable estimates.

Biggest Movers Up

  1. Ivy +18
  2. Audrey +15 (estimate)
  3. Harper +14 (estimate)
  4. Mackenzie +11 (estimate)
  5. Savannah +9

Also Up

Alice, Amelia, Annabelle, Charlotte, Chelsea, Emma, Evie, Isla, Maddison, Summer, Willow, Zara

Up Slightly

Ava, Eva, Emily, Grace, Lilly, Madison, Sophie and Sophia

Biggest Movers Down

  1. Georgia -16
  2. Holly -12
  3. Jessica -9
  4. Jasmine -7
  5. Addison -6 at least

Also Down

Alexis, Imogen, Isabelle and Isabella and Bella, Matilda, Maya, Mia, Paige, Sarah, Sienna

Down Slightly

Chloe, Elizabeth, Ella, Lucy, Olivia, Ruby, Scarlett

No Change in Position

  • Lily #14
  • Zoe #15
  • Hannah #19
  • Abigail #26
  • Layla #38
  • Stella #42

New to the Top 50

  • Harper #39
  • Willow #44
  • Mackenzie #46
  • Annabelle #49
  • Audrey #50

Gone from the Top 50

  • Hayley #43
  • Addison #45
  • Bella #47
  • Maya #48
  • Paige #49

Name Trends in Australia for 2012 – Boys

06 Saturday Apr 2013

Posted by A.O. in Name Data

≈ Comments Off on Name Trends in Australia for 2012 – Boys

Tags

Kidspot, McCrindle Research, name trends, popular names

I looked up Kidspot’s 2011 name data in order to see which names rose and fell the most, and as the list only covers the Top 50, I also consulted the national Top 100 for 2011 compiled by McCrindle Research. Although there were some differences in their methodologies (most notably McCrindle combined spellings for certain names), I thought it would be interesting to get at least an estimate for names which had risen far in the past year.

It may seem a bit controversial, but when I checked it against known numbers from Kidspot, it gave the same answer most of the time, and when it differed, it usually did so by only 1 or 2 places. So some of these may only be estimates, but I think they are reasonable estimates.

Biggest Movers Up

  1. Braxton +70 at least (estimate)
  2. Hudson +50 (estimate)
  3. Jaxon +28 (estimate)
  4. Hunter +16
  5. Eli +9

Also Up

Archie, Blake, Dylan, Flynn, Jackson, Mason, Mitchell, Noah, Patrick, Thomas

Up Slightly

Cooper, Harrison, Isaac, Jack, James, Liam, Max, Samuel

Biggest Movers Down

  1. Luke -15
  2. Matthew -13
  3. Aiden -12
  4. Jayden -11
  5. Nicholas -10 at least

Also Down

Benjamin, Connor, Daniel, Elijah, Harry, Hayden, Jake, Joseph, Joshua, Lachlan, Lucas, Michael, Nate

Down Slightly

Alexander, Ethan, Henry, Logan, Oliver, Oscar, Ryan, Sebastian, Tyler, William

No Change in Position

  • Jacob #13
  • Riley #16
  • Charlie #19
  • Xavier #20
  • Levi #26

New to the Top 50

  • Braxton #31
  • Jaxon #37
  • Patrick #42
  • Hudson #43
  • Dylan #44
  • Archie #46

Gone from the Top 50

  • Nicholas – #41
  • Hayden – #44
  • Nate – #45
  • Elijah #46
  • Joseph #48
  • Michael #50

Enter your email address to follow this blog

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments

waltzingmorethanmati… on Zarah Zaynab and Wolfgang…
Madelyn on Zarah Zaynab and Wolfgang…
drperegrine on Can Phoebe Complete This …
waltzingmorethanmati… on Rua and Rhoa
redrover23 on Rua and Rhoa

Blogroll

  • Appellation Mountain
  • Baby Name Pondering
  • Babynamelover's Blog
  • British Baby Names
  • Clare's Name News
  • For Real Baby Names
  • Geek Baby Names
  • Name Candy
  • Nameberry
  • Nancy's Baby Names
  • Ren's Baby Name Blog
  • Sancta Nomina
  • Swistle: Baby Names
  • The Art of Naming
  • The Baby Name Wizard
  • The Beauty of Names
  • Tulip By Any Name

RSS Feed

  • RSS - Posts

RSS Posts

  • Celebrity Baby News: Melanie Vallejo and Matt Kingston
  • Names from the TV Show “Cleverman”
  • Can Phoebe Complete This Sibset?
  • Zarah Zaynab and Wolfgang Winter
  • Baby, How Did You Get That Name?

Currently Popular

  • Celebrity Baby News: Alicia Molik and Tim Sullivan
  • Famous Name: Molly
  • The Top 100 Names of the 1920s in New South Wales
  • The Top 100 Names of the 1940s in New South Wales
  • Celebrity Baby News: AFL Babies

Tags

celebrity baby names celebrity sibsets english names famous namesakes fictional namesakes honouring locational names middle names name combinations name history name meaning name popularity name trends nicknames popular names saints names sibsets surname names twin sets unisex names

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • Waltzing More Than Matilda
    • Join 514 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Waltzing More Than Matilda
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...